Skip to main content
MIT NANDA Study 2025
0%

of AI projects fail

Source: MIT NANDA, 2025

The causes of AI project failures have been documented for years, yet 95% of companies keep falling into the same traps: POCs without strategy, unprepared data, untrained teams. Understanding these failure patterns is the first step to building a project that actually reaches production.

Understand why
The 5 traps to avoid

Why most AI projects fail

After analyzing hundreds of projects, MIT NANDA identified 5 recurring causes. None of them are technological.

01

Lack of clear strategy

The most common mistake: wanting to 'do AI' without a specific business objective. AI is not an end in itself, it's a means to achieve a measurable result. Without a clear vision, teams scatter, budgets explode, and projects die in indifference.

Real example:

A company invests $220,000 in a chatbot 'because everyone has one.' Six months later, it answers 50 questions per day, 80% of which could have been handled by a simple FAQ. The ROI is negative.

How to avoid it:

Start by identifying a concrete business problem. Quantify the current cost of this problem. Define success metrics BEFORE choosing a technical solution. AI should be the answer to a question, not a question looking for an answer.

02

Insufficient or poor quality data

AI feeds on data. Incomplete, biased, or poorly structured data produces mediocre or even dangerous results. It's the 'garbage in, garbage out' rule amplified by machine learning power.

Real example:

A retailer deploys a demand forecasting system trained on 2 years of data... including the COVID period. The model systematically predicts demand spikes that never happen. Inventory explodes.

How to avoid it:

Audit your data BEFORE launching the project. Invest in data quality (cleaning, enrichment, governance). Data preparation often represents the majority of the effort, not algorithms.

03

Lack of technical expertise

AI tools are accessible. The expertise to use them correctly is not. Confusing accessibility with mastery is a costly mistake. A poorly configured, trained, or deployed model can cause more harm than good.

Real example:

A startup uses GPT-4 to generate marketing content. Without prompt engineering or human verification, they publish factually false information. Brand reputation suffers for months.

How to avoid it:

Get support from experts who have already failed and learned. Prioritize practical experience over certifications. Implement human validation processes for all critical outputs.

04

Underestimating change management

AI disrupts processes, roles, and habits. Without support, even the best tool will be rejected. Resistance to change is natural; ignoring it is fatal.

Real example:

A hospital deploys a diagnostic support system. Doctors perceive it as a threat to their expertise and autonomy. They systematically bypass the tool. The $550,000 investment becomes a sunk cost.

How to avoid it:

Involve users from the design phase. Communicate the 'why' before the 'how'. Train, support, iterate. Celebrate early adopters. Measure adoption, not just deployment.

05

No defined ROI measurement

Without success metrics, it's impossible to know if the project succeeds or fails. Projects without clear KPIs become financial sinkholes impossible to stop or justify.

Real example:

A manufacturer deploys predictive maintenance. Three years later, no one knows if the system prevented breakdowns or generated costly false positives. The project continues 'because we've already invested.'

How to avoid it:

Define your KPIs before the first sprint. Establish a baseline (situation before AI). Measure regularly and compare. Be ready to pivot or stop if results don't meet expectations.

The 5% that succeed

What successful projects do differently

AI projects that deliver value share common characteristics. None are secrets, but all require rigor and experience.

Clear objectives

Prepared data

Solid expertise

Change support

Continuous measurement

The common thread of successful projects

They don't start with technology. They start with the business problem. They don't expect AI to be magic. They know it amplifies what exists: the good and the bad. And above all, they surround themselves with experts who have already learned from their failures.

The reality

Having the tools is not enough

Accessibility doesn't replace expertise

Ps
Photoshop

Having Photoshop doesn't make you a designer.

The tool is accessible. The expertise is not.

ChatGPT

Having ChatGPT doesn't make you an AI expert.

Using is not mastering.

Real example

The "vibe coding" trap

"There's a new kind of coding I call vibe coding, where you just vibe with the vibes and forget that the code exists."

Andrej Karpathy, OpenAI Co-founder
45%

of AI-generated code without expert review contains exploitable vulnerabilities

Security analyses 2024-2025

What AI generates without warning you

SQL Injections

Queries built by concatenation instead of prepared statements

XSS Vulnerabilities

User inputs displayed without HTML escaping

Exposed Secrets

API keys and tokens hardcoded in source code

Broken Auth

Identity checks that can be bypassed or poorly implemented

Tech Debt x8

Duplicated code making maintenance impossible

Race Conditions

Unhandled concurrent access corrupting data

What Karpathy doesn't mention: he has 20 years of AI expertise to validate generated code. Without that expertise, vibe coding becomes technical Russian roulette.

Our approach

We are part of the 5%

Not because we're smarter. Because we've accumulated enough failures to know how to avoid them.

1

25 years of technical experience

We've been experimenting with generative AI since its earliest public versions. Every project, every failure, every success enriches our expertise. We know what works in real conditions, not in demos.

2

Guaranteed quality

Every deliverable is tested, validated, and documented before reaching you. You get production-ready code, not fragile prototypes.

3

Results, not promises

We don't sell time. We deliver value. Our commitments are measurable: deadlines, quality, ROI. If we fail, we take responsibility.

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know

Why do AI projects fail?

95% of AI projects fail mainly for 5 reasons: lack of clear strategy (wanting to 'do AI' without a business objective), insufficient or poor quality data, lack of technical expertise (the tool is not enough), underestimating change management, and no ROI measurement. It's not a technology failure but an execution failure. Successful companies start with the business problem, not the technology.

How to succeed with an AI project in business?

The 5% of AI projects that succeed share common characteristics: clearly defined and measurable business objectives, prepared and quality data (data is often the biggest investment), solid technical expertise (get support from experienced experts), change management from day one, and success metrics defined before launch. The iterative approach (POC, MVP, progressive deployment) significantly reduces risks.

What budget to plan for an AI project?

AI project budgets vary considerably depending on ambition: a POC (proof of concept) starts at $15,000-30,000, an MVP at $50,000-150,000, and a full-scale deployment can reach several hundred thousand dollars. The common mistake is underestimating two items: data preparation and change management. A 'cheap' project that fails costs infinitely more than a well-sized project that succeeds.

How long does an AI project take?

Typical timelines are: 4-8 weeks for a POC, 3-6 months for an operational MVP, and 6-18 months for full deployment with IS integration and support. Successful projects adopt an iterative approach with regular deliverables (every 2-4 weeks) rather than a final 'big bang.' This allows for course correction, incremental value proof, and maintaining stakeholder engagement.

Ready to start?

Ready to join the 5%?

Tech team or not, success depends on expertise and support. We provide both.

We respond quickly and listen carefully.